Please note that Environment and Urbanization does not accept unsolicited proposals for special issues
October 2026: Community-led responses to urban/ peri-urban land conflict
Deadline for submissions: 15th January 2026 for complete submissions; expressions of interest welcomed any time before 17th November 2025.
In cities globally, urban growth processes combined with local economic, social, political and environmental factors put unprecedented pressure on urban and peri-urban land (Lombard and Rakodi 2016). Now more than ever, land is a scarce and contested resource, generating widening inequalities and conflicts of interests among actors with unbalanced power. Although the precise links between urban conflict and land dynamics remain contested (Gizelis
Recent literature explores everyday experiences of land conflict, land negotiation and claim-making, underscoring the role of identity and individuals’ agency, but also linking conflicts across different scales and the intersection of social practices and dominant land regimes in providing responses as well as new sources of insecurity (e.g. Gribat and Pizzo 2020; Van Leeuwen and Van der Haar 2016; Van der Haar, van Leeuwen and de Vries 2020; Van Overbeek and Tamás 2020). Against this backdrop, expanding an incipient debate on community-led responses to land conflict is relevant to both academic and policy debates. We define ‘community-led’ broadly to include groupings of residents working together in pursuit of “dialogical, collective decision making” in diverse contexts (Nel 2018, 839) with or without the involvement of other actors. Contributing to understandings of how land conflict unfolds and is addressed through social and collective practices, this special issue will foreground community-led initiatives to prevent, arbitrate or resolve everyday land conflict in urban and peri-urban areas.
We welcome papers that engage with diverse actors, processes and institutions that are involved in community-led
We invite submissions responding to questions that include:
- What types of land conflict do communities experience related to real estate development, access to housing and infrastructure, rural
– urban migration, vulnerabilities along ethnic or religious lines, gender differences, challenges of inheritance or renting, among others? - How are they prevented, handled or resolved in specific contexts and by whom? In particular, how are local communities involved in these responses?
- What type of outcomes do these conflicts and responses generate for the local community and specific groups?
- Where could governments direct their policy focus? To what extent could they build upon or learn from existing community-led mechanisms of land conflict arbitration in given contexts?
Format
Submission guidelines
Please consult the general journal submission guidelines in advance of making your submission: https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/EAU. Please note that final submissions must be made using the journal’s submission system: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/eauj.
Contact
Please contact Jenny Peebles, E&U Managing Editor, to submit an expression of interest or with any queries: Jenny.Peebles@iied.org.
Guest editors
Melanie Lombard is Senior Lecturer in the School of Geography and Planning, University of Sheffield. Her research explores aspects of urban informality, relating particularly to housing, land and place, through a focus on urban residents’ everyday constructive activities, in cities in Latin America, Africa and the UK. She has previously edited special sections of Urban Studies on ‘urban land conflict in the global South’ (2016, with Carole Rakodi) and the Journal of Development Studies on ‘urban informality’ (2019, with Nicola Banks and Diana Mitlin).
Martina Manara is a Lecturer in the Bartlett School of Planning, University College London. She studies urban informality with a focus on de facto land rights and wider community regulations of land and other resources in African cities. Her work develops innovative interdisciplinary methods to leverage the perspective of local actors and inform policy. She is a coordinator of the Development and Urbanisation Study Group at DSA, which gathers a network of urban informality scholars.
References
Balestri, S (2019), “Growing cities in Sub-Saharan Africa: land competing interests in peri-urban areas and organised violence”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie Vol 110, No 2, pages 191–208.
Elfversson, E and K Hoglund (2018), “Home of last resort: Urban land conflict and the Nubians in Kibera, Kenya”, Urban Studies Vol 55, No 8, pages 1749–1765.
Gizelis, T I, S Pickering and H Urdal (2021), “Conflict on the urban fringe: Urbanization, environmental stress, and urban unrest in Africa”, Political Geography Vol 86, 102357.
Gribat, N and B Pizzo (2020), “Introduction to the special issue: the politics of land – dominant regimes and situated practices”, International Planning Studies Vol 25, No 3, pages 237–246.
Lombard, M (2016), “Land conflict in peri-urban areas: Exploring the effects of land reform on informal settlement in Mexico”, Urban Studies Vol 53, No 13, pages 2700–2720.
Lombard, M and C Rakodi (2016), “Urban land conflict in the Global South: Towards an analytical framework”, Urban Studies Vol 53, No 13, pages 2683–2699.
Nel, H (2018), “Community leadership: A comparison between asset-based community-led development (ABCD) and the traditional needs-based approach”, Development Southern Africa Vol 35, No 6, pages 839–851.
Schwarz, A and M Streule (2016), “A transposition of territory: Decolonized perspectives in current urban research”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research Vol 40, No 5, pages 1000–16.
Van der Haar, G, M van Leeuwen and L de Vries (2020), “Claim-making as social practice – Land, politics and conflict in Africa”, Geoforum Vol 109, pages 111–114.
Van Leeuwen, M and G Van der Haar (2016), “Theorizing the Land-Violent Conflict Nexus”, World Development Vol 78, pages 94–104.
Van Overbeek, F and P A Tamás (2020), “Claim-making through subjectivation: A governmentality analysis of associational performance to claim land in the hybridity of peri-urban Bukavu”, Geoforum Vol 109, pages 152–161.
Zoomers, A, F van Noorloos, K Otsuki, G Steel, G van Westen (2017), “The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes”, World Development Vol 92, pages 242–252.
April 2026: Tomorrow’s cities: Co-designing urban futures for equitable resilience
Deadline for submissions: 15th July 2025 for complete submissions; expressions of interest welcomed any time before 16th June 2025.
The combined pressures of climate change and rapid urbanization present immense challenges to our cities and their current and future inhabitants. But with change comes opportunity. Who will benefit from this changing physical and social environment and its governance system? Past experience suggests that changing conditions in urban/natural environments do not easily result in equal benefits to different groups, and that those persistently marginalized have few spaces to shape the future. This is already observed for example where urban housing markets or policy generate precarious housing in areas exposed to natural hazards, whilst dominant groups are better insulated in less exposed neighbourhoods with enhanced infrastructure. In this model, climate change and rapid urbanization are set to accelerate already established trajectories of inequitable development including (and to some extent driven by) the concentration of risk amongst the less wealthy and poor majority.
Challenging this default setting for development and its spiral into risk as a marker of inequity requires decision-support mechanisms that can offer alternative visions of the future. Visions that can be tested against plausible hazard events (related to and compounding with climate change) and so help define specific action points for revising policy and planning in enabling environments. Such mechanisms will work best when combining scientific and place-based inputs, so that difficult decisions can be approached in ways that are considerate of diverse voices and meaningful to local groups.
Greater emphasis on the enabling environment for shaping the future of cities to bring equity in resilience – and equity through resilience – responds also to the United Nations Habitat Assembly resolution adopted on 9 June 2023 to create a human settlements resilience framework for early warning, foresight, risk reduction, crisis response and post-crisis recovery and reconstruction. Urban planning techniques offer specific purchase on these elements with scope for hybrid methodologies between planning and proactive risk management/climate change adaptation.
Urban Shaping describes those methods that aim to get ahead of formal urban planning and design to open up additional procedural opportunity for inclusion and the localization of decision-making. This becomes especially important where urban change is rapid and at scale with pressures to prioritize efficient over inclusive decision-making or to move swiftly to rolling out land-uses and designs to meet established dominant urban development interests. Urban Shaping and similar approaches go beyond the limits of urban planning to allow more propositional visions and plans for land-use/building/urban space that aims at breaking cycles of risk accumulation through deploying inclusive and science-based futures methods.
This special issue invites contributions from researchers, professionals and policy makers to showcase methodologies and experiences for Urban Shaping that can go beyond the limits of urban planning to allow more propositional visions for land-use and building design aimed at breaking cycles of risk accumulation through deploying inclusive and science-based analysis. We are particularly interested in approaches that are:
- Inclusive and co-produced – integrating science and policy, local and technical knowledge and different sectors;
- Forward-looking – engaging with long-term planning tools and interdisciplinary methods of future visioning, foresight and scenario thinking;
- Risk-sensitive – incorporating a focus on disaster risk reduction, acknowledging the effects of multiple hazards in cities and understanding that climate change and rapid urbanization will continue to exacerbate their impacts;
- Committed to equitable outcomes – considering how hazard and its associated risk (and the consequences of risk management and climate change adaptation interventions) can be measured and tracked across society.
The special issue will bring together work from across sciences and from policy makers and local actor viewpoints to help define the action space to support a movement towards inclusive risk-informed urban planning.
We invite submissions responding to questions that include:
- What might the role be for urban development planning and connected processes of natural hazard risk assessment, in challenging negative spirals of inequity under climate change and rapid urbanization?
- What examples are there of inclusive and risk-informed decision-making on urban planning? To what extent, and in which ways, are these engaging with long-term future approaches?
- What evidence is there that such approaches lead to more equitable outcomes?
Format
As outlined on the Environment & Urbanization website, “articles should be between 1,500 and 7,500 words. This limit does not include references and explanations in endnotes but does include table and figure text”. To ensure clarity and alignment with the journal’s expectations, we recommend the following:
• Standard papers (empirical research, theoretical contributions, and literature reviews) should generally be between 5,000 and 7,500 words, ensuring depth and rigour in analysis.
While the great majority of accepted submissions will be those in standard peer reviewed journal paper format, we will also consider a smaller number of contributions in non-traditional and non-written formats, specifically short perspectives from urban professionals, politicians and local actors partnering with or applying the novel approaches described:
• Non-traditional papers (policy perspectives and commentaries). These are concise, provocative pieces aimed at sparking new research or policy discussions. Contributions from practitioners and policy makers are especially welcome. Word length should typically be 1,500 to 2,000 words. While references to academic or policy literature are encouraged, they are not always essential, depending on the piece’s objectives.
• Non-written formats (e.g., photo essays, artwork submissions) will be assessed based on their equivalent space in the journal, generally corresponding to 5–10 pages. We are happy to discuss these contributions on a case-by-case basis to ensure fair assessment.
Submission guidelines
Please consult the general journal submission guidelines in advance of making your submission. Please note that final submissions must be made using the journal’s submission system.
Contact
Please contact Jenny Peebles, E&U Managing Editor, to submit an expression of interest or with any queries: Jenny.Peebles@iied.org.
Guest editors
Senior editor:
Mark Pelling (Professor of Risk and Disaster Reduction, Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London) is a specialist in climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction and urban governance with a focus on global South cities.
Co-editors:
Thaisa Comelli (Senior Research Fellow, Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, UCL) is an urban planner specialising in participatory and community-led approaches to urban development, climate adaptation and resilience, especially in the global South.
Gemma Cremen (Lecturer, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, UCL) is a specialist in engineering approaches to risk assessment, physical vulnerability modelling and decision-support frameworks.
Jeremy Phillips (Professor, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol) is a natural hazards specialist with a background in volcanology and interest in communication of risk, citizen science and working in data scarce contexts.
Elisa Sevilla Perez (Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador) is an historian of science and society with a focus on environmental change including natural hazard science, its understanding and popular communication.
October 2025: Addressing socio-technical assistance for socially and environmentally just cities
Deadline for submissions has passed.
The aim of this special issue is to discuss how professional practices can contribute to more sustainable and emancipatory forms of city-making. While today’s cities are characterized by unequal relations of power driven by exploitation and value extraction, they are also spaces where grassroots and civil society networks establish emancipatory and environmentally regenerative city-making practices based on principles of care and solidarity. Professionally grounded spatial practices often play a crucial role in supporting these initiatives by offering allyship and support to communities and their organizations.
This special issue aims to highlight and examine community socio-technical assistance in the fields of architecture and urban planning. We want to focus on the work of organizations such as architectural and planning NGOs, technical advisory offices, design clinics, and technical assistance networks that support residents in informal settlements and social housing initiatives. Our goal is to critically reflect on the positions, approaches, and methods of these practices, as well as address the challenges related to negotiating questions of power, voice and expertise between professionals and communities. We are interested in examining these relationships from the viewpoints of both practitioners and residents, considering both local and networked experiences. As per E&U’s scope, we encourage diverse contributions, especially from Africa, Asia, and Latin America, focusing on critical reflections on experiences such as those of the Community Architects Network in Asia or the Fórum de Assessoria Técnica Popular in Brazil.
This project goes beyond the usual research–practice divide and serves as both an editorial undertaking and a coalition-building effort. Through co-editing this special issue, we aim to weave together a trans-local network of researchers and practitioners in architecture and urban planning who have supported the work of social movements in different locations, scales and temporalities.
We invite submissions in the form of academic articles or Field Notes based on original research or innovative practices responding to questions that include:
- What is the role of professionally grounded spatial practices in promoting socially and environmentally just cities in specific locations, scales, and timeframes?
- What are the guiding principles, partnerships, methods, and tools that define the work of these practices? Additionally, what concepts and frameworks can help us better understand their operational methods?
- How do professional practices contribute to the collaborative creation and dissemination of urban knowledge? What are the explicit and implicit forms of knowledge production involved in these practices?
- Finally, how can research support the work of professionally grounded spatial practices, and what does such research involve?
By addressing these questions, we aim to gain a deeper understanding of the potential impact of professionally grounded spatial practices on promoting just and sustainable urban development, and how research can assist their efforts.
Editors
Beatrice De Carli, Senior Lecturer at the School of Architecture and Landscape, University of Sheffield and Managing Associate at Architecture Sans Frontières UK.
Jhono Bennett, Doctoral Candidate in the TACK / Communities of Tacit Knowledge: Architecture and its Ways of Knowing Network, University College London, and Co-founder of 1to1 Agency of Engagement.
Tanzil Shafique, Lecturer in Urban Design, University of Sheffield.